4 thoughts on “Another Great Example Of How The “Climate Gate” Email Hack Is A Non-Issue”
Very well done video.
This video is bettehttp://biggovernment.com/2009/12/11/un-security-stops-journalists-questions-about-climategate/#more-44722r,
Patricius, you are comically wrong.
First let me just say that for a person who believes in Atlantis, and feels strongly that your “theories” can’t be refuted by science (ps. science can also not prove unicorns are not real, or that dragons are not real), and you have some sort of agenda of commenting here with your “evidence” that global warming is all a hoax. The problem is your video shows supposed “journalist” Phelim McAleer (who ps. is a climate diner who went so far as to make a documentary filled with errors and misrepresentations) blabbing on and wasting the time at an important event. It is no wonder they paid him little mind. He is an idiot.
Why don’t you go find a nice piece of ocean front property and build your house right near the water line. That would be the kind of commitment to your views I would support. Please however stop trolling this website with your piss poor science, and misinformed and simple notions. In the future when you comment to show how right you are, I suggest you back up your evidence with some science (peer reviewed and published would be the best). Otherwise you continue to make yourself look like a raving loon.
Nice spin; however, you cherry picked your emails because you knew alot of your readers/viewers hadn’t read the emails. You forget to cite the emails where Phil Jones mentions the MMs and their constant demand for the original data set and where he reveals there are Freedom of Information rules in the UK and he would rather destroy the data set than hand it over. Lo & behold we find that years of original data had been “lost”. Nice spin, bud. Try your magic on other simpletons.
And how about the the side notes of the computer programmer with his “fudge factor” comments?
This combined with NASA refusing to release original data sets points to a science that is not settled but rather a science that is open to interpretation. It is opened to interpretation because the evidence is not conclusive. Which leads to the sorry case of Michael Mann & his discredited hockey stick fabrication. Incidentally, the email about the “trick” and “hiding the decline” was in reference to Michael Mann’s shenanigans with his hockey stick debacle.
You’re a perfect example of what happens to science when it is politicized. You become a spin doctor and that is what you’e doing here. Spinning the facts.
Very well done video.
This video is bettehttp://biggovernment.com/2009/12/11/un-security-stops-journalists-questions-about-climategate/#more-44722r,
Patricius, you are comically wrong.
First let me just say that for a person who believes in Atlantis, and feels strongly that your “theories” can’t be refuted by science (ps. science can also not prove unicorns are not real, or that dragons are not real), and you have some sort of agenda of commenting here with your “evidence” that global warming is all a hoax. The problem is your video shows supposed “journalist” Phelim McAleer (who ps. is a climate diner who went so far as to make a documentary filled with errors and misrepresentations) blabbing on and wasting the time at an important event. It is no wonder they paid him little mind. He is an idiot.
Why don’t you go find a nice piece of ocean front property and build your house right near the water line. That would be the kind of commitment to your views I would support. Please however stop trolling this website with your piss poor science, and misinformed and simple notions. In the future when you comment to show how right you are, I suggest you back up your evidence with some science (peer reviewed and published would be the best). Otherwise you continue to make yourself look like a raving loon.
Nice spin; however, you cherry picked your emails because you knew alot of your readers/viewers hadn’t read the emails. You forget to cite the emails where Phil Jones mentions the MMs and their constant demand for the original data set and where he reveals there are Freedom of Information rules in the UK and he would rather destroy the data set than hand it over. Lo & behold we find that years of original data had been “lost”. Nice spin, bud. Try your magic on other simpletons.
And how about the the side notes of the computer programmer with his “fudge factor” comments?
This combined with NASA refusing to release original data sets points to a science that is not settled but rather a science that is open to interpretation. It is opened to interpretation because the evidence is not conclusive. Which leads to the sorry case of Michael Mann & his discredited hockey stick fabrication. Incidentally, the email about the “trick” and “hiding the decline” was in reference to Michael Mann’s shenanigans with his hockey stick debacle.
You’re a perfect example of what happens to science when it is politicized. You become a spin doctor and that is what you’e doing here. Spinning the facts.